A United States judge has ordered Google to revise its mobile app business, allowing Android users more options for downloading apps and making payments. The ruling follows a jury verdict in favor of Epic Games. U.S. District Judge James Donato's injunction requires Google to increase competition in its Play Store by allowing Android apps from other sources, reports Al Jazeera.
Donato’s order said that for three years, Google could not prohibit the use of in-app payment methods and must allow users to download competing third-party Android app platforms or stores.
The order restricts Google from making payments to device makers to preinstall its app store and from sharing revenue generated from the Play store with other app distributors. Epic did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Alphabet shares closed 2.5 percent lower at $164.39 on Monday, following the ruling. Donato said Epic and Google must establish a three-person technical committee to implement and monitor the injunction. Epic and Google each get a pick, and those two members will select the third person.
Google in a statement said it would appeal the verdict that led to the injunction to the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, and will ask the US courts to pause Donato’s order pending appeal. “Ultimately, while these changes presumably satisfy Epic, they will cause a range of unintended consequences that will harm American consumers, developers and device makers,” Google said.
Donato said his injunction would go into effect on November 1, which he said would give Google time to “bring its current agreements and practices into compliance”.
Epic’s lawsuit, filed in 2020, accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and how they pay for in-app transactions.
The Cary, North Carolina-based company persuaded a jury in December 2023 that Google unlawfully stifled competition through its controls over app distribution and payments, paving the way for Donato’s injunction.
Google had urged Donato to reject Epic’s proposed reforms, arguing they were costly, overly restrictive and could harm consumer privacy and security. The judge mostly dismissed those arguments during an August hearing. “You’re going to end up paying something to make the world right after having been found to be a monopolist,” he told Google’s lawyers.
In a separate antitrust case in Washington, US District Judge Amit Mehta on August 5 ruled for the US Justice Department and said Google had illegally monopolized Web search, spending billions to become the internet’s default search engine.
Google also began a trial in September in Virginia federal court in a Justice Department lawsuit over its dominance in the market for advertising technology.
Bd pratidin English/Afia