Artificial intelligence represents a mixed blessing for the legal field, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said in a year-end report published on Sunday, urging "caution and humility" as the evolving technology transforms how judges and lawyers go about their work, reports Reuters.
John Roberts struck an ambivalent tone in his 13-page report. He said AI had potential to increase access to justice for indigent litigants, revolutionize legal research and assist courts in resolving cases more quickly and cheaply while also pointing to privacy concerns and the current technology's inability to replicate human discretion.
He wrote, "I predict that human judges will be around for a while. But with equal confidence I predict that judicial work - particularly at the trial level - will be significantly affected by AI."
Roberts's commentary is his most significant discussion to date of the influence of AI on the law, and coincides with a number of lower courts contending with how best to adapt to a new technology capable of passing the bar exam but also prone to generating fictitious content, known as "hallucinations."
He emphasized that "any use of AI requires caution and humility."
The chief justice also mentioned an instance where AI hallucinations had led lawyers to cite non-existent cases in court papers, which the chief justice said is "always a bad idea."
Roberts did not elaborate beyond saying the phenomenon "made headlines this year."
Last week, for instance, Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former fixer and lawyer, said in court papers unsealed last week that he mistakenly gave his attorney fake case citations generated by an AI programme that made their way into an official court filing.
Other instances of lawyers including AI-hallucinated cases in legal briefs have also been documented.
Bd-pratidin English/Golam Rosul
